Healthcare Companies that Tied to Supporting Israel

In our globally connected world, the ethical aspect of consumer decisions is increasingly crucial. Delving into the ownership and operational ties of common brands often uncovers associations with complex geopolitical situations.

Understanding these links plays a crucial role in making thoughtful decisions concerning purchases and career paths.

1. Procter & Gamble

With ties to an R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, rethinking buying, selling, or working with P&G is important to express concerns regarding their investments.

2. Walmart

Walmart’s swift response to the Israeli conflict and the absence of support for charities in Gaza warrant consideration in shopping at Walmart or working for the company.

3. Pampers

Procter and Gamble owns Pampers, and its production and affiliation with the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, suggests reevaluation when buying, selling, or working with Pampers.

See Also: Insurance Companies with Ties to Israel’s Arms Trade

4. Dove

Part of Unilever, Dove’s ties to Unilever’s Israeli distribution strategies involving Ben & Jerry’s warrant consideration, prompting consumers to avoid purchasing, selling, or working with Dove.

5. Olay

Owned by Procter and Gamble, Olay’s association with an R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, suggests reconsidering purchasing, selling, or working for Olay.

6. Gillette

Under Procter and Gamble’s ownership, Gillette’s connection to the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, prompts reevaluation when purchasing, selling, or working with the brand.

7. Oral B

Owned by Procter and Gamble, Oral B’s ties to the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, signal a need for thought when buying, selling, or working with Oral B.

8. Pantene

Under Procter and Gamble’s ownership, Pantene’s association with the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, suggests reconsidering buying, selling, or working with Pantene.

9. Old Spice

Under the ownership of Procter and Gamble, Old Spice’s connection to an R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, raises concerns. Consider reassessing purchases, sales, or employment with Old Spice.

10. Head and Shoulders

Under Procter and Gamble’s ownership, Head and Shoulders’ affiliation with an R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, raises concerns. Reconsideration in buying, selling, or working with Head and Shoulders is suggested.

11. Always

A personal care product under Procter and Gamble, heavily invested in an R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine. To voice opposition to this connection, avoiding purchasing or selling Always products and refraining from working for the brand is recommended.

12. Braun

Under Procter and Gamble’s ownership, Braun’s link to an R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, raises concerns, prompting a reevaluation in buying, selling, or working with the brand.

See Also: Luxury Companies Affiliated with Israeli Investments

13. Clear Blue

Owned by Procter and Gamble, Clear Blue’s connection with an R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, signals a need to reconsider purchasing, selling, or working with the brand.

14. Lux

Part of Unilever, Lux is connected to the situation involving Ben & Jerry’s in Israel. To oppose these actions, consider refraining from buying, selling, or working for Lux.

15. Tampax

Procter and Gamble’s ownership of Tampax connects it to the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, signaling a need for thought when purchasing, vending, or working with Tampax.

16. Herbal Essences

Owned by Procter and Gamble, Herbal Essences’ tie to the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, warrants reconsideration in purchasing, selling, or working with the brand.

17. Axe

Owned by Unilever, which also owns Ben & Jerry’s, Axe’s association with Unilever’s strategies in Israel requires avoiding purchase, sale, or employment with Axe to demonstrate disapproval.

18. Rexona

Another Unilever-owned brand entangled in the Ben & Jerry’s situation, it’s important to consider refraining from buying, selling, or working for Rexona to voice disapproval.

19. Vicks

Being under Procter and Gamble’s ownership, Vicks has connections to the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine. This association prompts a reevaluation when purchasing, selling, or working with Vicks.

20. Tresemme

Under Unilever’s ownership, Tresemme’s association with the circumvented decision to sell products in Israel reflects the importance of reconsideration in buying, selling, or working for Tresemme.

21. Seven Seas

Under Procter and Gamble’s ownership, Seven Seas’ association with the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine, suggests reconsideration when buying, selling, or working with Seven Seas.

22. Sudocrem

Sudocrem, owned by Israeli pharmaceuticals giant Teva, is involved in operations within Occupied Palestine. Consider your support when buying, selling, or working for Sudocrem.

23. Venus

Venus, a personal care product for women owned by Procter and Gamble, has ties to the R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine. Careful consideration is needed when purchasing, selling, or working for Venus.

24. Amika

Manufactured on occupied Palestinian land, this hair care brand’s association suggests refraining from purchasing or selling Amika products to express dissent.

25. Aussie

Part of Procter and Gamble’s roster, investing in an R&D center in Tel Aviv, Occupied Palestine. To uphold ethical considerations, refraining from buying or selling Aussie products and avoiding employment with the brand is encouraged.

26. Lynx

Another brand owned by Unilever, associated with the Ben & Jerry’s situation. To express concern, avoid purchasing, selling, or working for Lynx.

As the market continues to evolve, consumer responsibility grows ever more critical. This exploration underscores the importance of being aware of the broader contexts behind brand ownership and operations.

It encourages individuals to weigh these factors when making choices, whether as a consumer or a professional, in a quest to align personal decisions with ethical considerations.